Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dr Maureen Wright's avatar

Ah, so this is why you went to Paris!

So many layers to unpick here to the questions of "what are we looking at/listening too"? We receive & analyse the "words & deeds" of "great men" differently these days from those of the 1950s. We turn the "undeserving" into celebrities & often vilify those who have some claim to "greatness". The terms have become warped & twisted & today's world can be a topsy-turvy place.

Montgomery was a controversial figure both in his lifetime & beyond, but for the rank & file under his command at least, he was an icon. My father's remembrances of him testify to that. For a man who served him so closely as Mr. Hewlett, that iconic status would have been magnified. And Monty did, in so many instances, "get the job done". Surely we didn't then, and shouldn't now, appoint the nation's Field Marshalls for their ability to charm over cocktails and canapés!

Any historian worthy of the name knows a personal memoir is full of subjectivity. It's just the way things are. But with careful analysis, such testimony as Mr. Hewett's can bring out a deeper charm hiding within an irascible character. For the postmodernists among us, it turns the kaleidoscope & changes the image.

Expand full comment
James McNeill's avatar

Interesting. I think one should take into account some recent discussion of veteran accounts and memories and the veracity and reliability thereof. Nevertheless a remarkable experience. Certainly more noteworthy than my father’s stories of national service, some of which I’m beginning to doubt.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts